Intact, and in place
Unlike traditional museums, which are housed in a single building, an "ecological museum" takes the natural environment and cultural resources of the area itself its as subject, with local people participating in promotion, preservation, and maintenance on their own initiative.
Park director Chiang Ming-chin, who participated in monitoring and vendor coordination in the initial stages of construction, observes, "The attitude behind an ecological park is one of cherishing and carefully protecting a natural and cultural heritage. So the aim of the teams working on the Gold Ecological Park is absolutely not to create an amusement park. They also want to avoid huge crowds of visitors or allowing free market principles to operate at the expense of preserving the cultural characteristics of the place."
The biggest difference between the park and traditional museums is its transcending of the public's stereotype of a museum corresponding to a single building. Chiang stresses that the responsibility of a traditional museum is to preserve its collection and to provide visitors with opportunities for personal growth. Therefore, exhibited items, along with experts and scholars working in relevant fields, are their main assets. In an ecological park, on the other hand, the protected natural environment and historical and cultural assets are the true subjects. How much importance area residents attach to local assets is key to sustained development of an ecological park.
Therefore, besides specific exhibitions staged within the park, it focuses on drawing on community resources to preserve intact Chinkuashih's precious natural scenery, original mining industry sites and historic buildings, while also aiming to give them new life.
"It was only through many years of talking with locals that I realized every place in Chinkuashih has a story to tell, and every place has its charm," says Chiang, his young face seeming to glow with the gentle brilliance of the gold-rush town itself.
During the Japanese colonial period, society in the mining area was stratified. Whether in the division of labor, the arrangement of the residential areas, or simply in daily life, "Japanese" and "Taiwanese" were clearly differentiated, with upper and lower classes created within each of these broad classes. In work, Japanese mostly served in higher-level positions such as specialized technician or manager. Taiwanese, on the other hand, were usually miners, with only a minority serving as machine operators or handling repairs.
"The stories told by members of different classes are not at all alike, making it hard to imagine that they were living in the same time and place," says Chiang. Like the scenes in the Taiwanese film Hill of No Return, the children of highly placed employees dressed in bright clothes and sat in orderly arrangements in a classroom, while miners' children went to school barefoot and wearing pants with holes in them. As WWII was drawing to a close, around 400 or 500 British and Commonwealth POWs captured in the South Pacific were sent here to work in the copper mines, with many of them dying and being buried here. It is only many years after the events, when the divisions and antipathies of ethnicity and class have faded, that the oral histories compiled by the park are providing an opportunity for local residents to share the memories and stories that they have hidden away from each other for so long.
Near the Shuinantung parking lot are the remnants of a smelting plant built under Japanese rule. Various types of gold and copper extraction equipment are strewn across the slopes, making it easy to imagine the bustle of mining activity that once took place here.