The post-migration era
After moving from the White Australia Policy to welcoming Asian migrants with open arms, in 2009 the then Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd introduced the "Big Australia" policy, aiming for a total population of 35 million (currently about 20 million) by 2050. But in 2010, after Australia's first female prime minister, Labor Party leader Julia Gillard, came to power, the policy was abandoned. Gillard has argued that Australia should not rush into expanding its population, mainly because although labor shortages exist in some areas, there are few employment opportunities in others. A flexible but stable population strategy and the correct skilled worker strategy will help to achieve a balance.
Australia Asia Group, an agency specializing in Australian immigration policy, points out that Australia's immigration regulations change constantly, with the latest version to be released in July this year. But generally the investment threshold of the business migration stream will probably continue to rise because of the appreciation of the Australian dollar. And for the investment migration stream, which can be accessed through investment in either business or national bonds, the waiting period may be up to two or three years due to the limited intake.
Conditions for the skilled migration stream have become more stringent than in the past, requiring an IELTS test scored at seven (of nine) in listening, speaking, reading and writing. The lists of occupations have also been tightened; the most popular categories, chefs and hairdressers, for example, have been removed.
Australia's attraction is declining. And in recent years, due to Taiwan's political stability and economic recovery, the number of Taiwanese who want to emigrate to Australia has declined. Also, because the children of first-generation migrants have grown up and graduated from college, the more elderly migrants are starting to move back to their hometowns. The return to Taiwan has begun.
According to a survey done by Professors Hsu Jung-chung and Jiang Honglan on the intentions of Taiwanese migrants to return home, it was found that 32.3% are considering a return. Among these, 14.3% claim that the move is for employment, and 10.3% simply want to return to their hometowns.
Hsu describes this phenomenon as leapfrog migration. "This model means that migrants lose cultural identity and integration opportunities for adapting to their new home. However, with more direct air travel opportunities opening up, new communications technology, and boundaries between countries disappearing, cross-border migration has become as frequent and usual as movement within a nation."
Chiou Chwei-Liang notes that when Taiwanese migrants come to Australia, they first buy a house, and then enjoy a relaxing lifestyle. But in 10 years or less, they become bored, and their money is disappearing faster than expected. They begin to feel stressed, and if they become ill, they need an interpreting service when they see a doctor. Certainly they lose all sense of identification with Australia.
"If you don't have an income in Australia, inevitably you will feel stressed," says Hsu. In the past few years, those who find it difficult to adapt to the Australian lifestyle, and those who want to return to Taiwan, have already gone home. Those who remain have to strive to find a job, or start a business because of the high cost of living, with the Australian dollar, the cost of air travel and everyday commodity prices all rising.
With a vast land mass and rich natural resources, Australia is "the lucky country," its people able to enjoy prosperity and a generous welfare system. Australian native animals, the koala and kangaroo, also enjoy happy and carefree lives.