Driving Mr. Daisy
In 1979, at the age of 34, Teng Che-ming was awarded a scholarship by the US National Institutes of Health to pursue postdoctoral research in America. He went to Wayne State University in Detroit to study under Professor Walter Seegers, a renowned expert in blood coagulation.
Seegers, a nominee on multiple occasions for the Nobel Prize and 69 years old at the time, found a rental property for Teng's family. Not long after their arrival, Seegers spent two hours teaching Teng and his wife to drive a car, but American cars were big, and Seegers worried that the short-statured Teng might be unable to see the road clearly or reach the brakes, so he decided to personally chauffeur his student to and from school. The arrangement lasted for two years.
Teng speaks fondly of the hour they spent together on the road: "Every day was a seminar. He'd talk, and I'd be along for the ride. It was the best and most complete instruction I've ever received in my life."
On the academic front, Seegers assigned Teng two research assistants. Whenever Teng finished writing a research paper, Seegers would spend hours with him discussing it line by line before having a secretary type it up. Teng completed seven or eight research papers over the course of two years.
In 1983, not long after Teng returned to Taiwan, Li Zhen-yuan became chairman of the Pharmacological Society of Taiwan, and Teng was named secretary-general. The two worked together in those capacities for seven years, during which time Teng saw first-hand Li's great commitment to social causes (he worked hard, for example, for repeal of the "thought crime" provision in Article 100 of the Criminal Code). As one who drew a sharp line between right and wrong, Li was a highly principled straight shooter. Rubbing elbows with him honed Teng's leadership skills.
Academic advisor Ouyang Zhaohe exposed Teng to a unique combination of intellectual rigor and low-key humility. Professor Seegers offered lessons that ranged far beyond the sphere of academics, and enabled him to appreciate the benefits of teamwork. And Li Zhenyuan provided an uncompromising demand for excellence that served as a whetstone for Teng's considerable abilities.
"The teacher-student relationship is a precious thing, and should be appreciated. When your teacher requires you to write two research reports in order to graduate, don't go thinking your teacher is too strict," says Teng.
Chinese pharma goes scientific
In 1987, Teng decided to branch out from snake venoms and begin studying traditional Chinese medicines.
Before studying venomous snakes, says Teng, he knew they had venom, whether the venom could be fatal, and the nature of their toxicity, but the situation with traditional Chinese medicines is altogether different. The subject is extremely broad, and ingredients may be inactive in certain cases but active in others, so research must entail the cooperation of people from different specialties, such as specialists in blood disorders and internal medicine.
Moreover, the literature on traditional Chinese medicines is a tricky guide. Some pharmacological effects are different from those described in old texts, possibly leading to different results.
Under Teng's leadership, the NTU Department of Pharmacology has built a small Chinese medicines research group composed of a dozen or so chemists and crude drug specialists. The group studies various Chinese herbal medicines that have the effect of "activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis" (such as magnolia flower buds, Aglaia elliptifolia, celery, Ligisticum rhizome, and plants in the gentian family) in an effort to identify their bioactivity and determine whether they can improve blood circulation, or help to eliminate or prevent blood clots.
Teng believes the study of Chinese herbal medicines must become a modern, international undertaking, and he therefore screens medicinal materials for bioactivity in the same way such screening is conducted in the development of Western medicines. Starting with in-vitro testing to determine the biochemical and biofunctional properties of enzymes, receptors, cells, tissues, organs, and the like, he then proceeds with animal testing to evaluate pharmacological effects upon the heart, blood platelets, and blood vessels. He also tests to see whether any given substance will dilate blood vessels, and how it affects prostate tissue. He then performs extraction, separation, and purification, moving forward one step at a time to screen for bioactive ingredients.
Time-consuming process
Traditional Chinese medicines have huge potential, but they must be carefully screened with a rigorously scientific attitude, starting with simple items before moving on to the more complex. Clinical data must be used to determine efficacy and safety. The process is a long one.
But it can be done. Many note the successful development in Germany of a -Ginkgo biloba extract that to date has racked up over US$2 billion in sales worldwide. Another example is the cancer-inhibiting taxol (also called "paclitaxel"), which is extracted from yew bark and generates over US$1.2 billion in sales per year. There is big money to be made, so many feel that Taiwan should also be taking this path.
But does the fact that Chinese herbal medicines have their origin in Chinese culture necessarily mean that they offer a competitive niche for Taiwan? After 20 years of research, Teng has his own take on the situation.
He points out that the Germans mostly work to develop extracts from a single type of plant, which is relatively easy. Taiwan and mainland China, in contrast, generally research compounds. Gentian liver-purging decoction, used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat liver ailments, has five different medicinal ingredients: gentian root, baikal skullcap root, cape jasmine fruit, oriental water plantain rhizome, and thorowax root. The interaction between them is quite complex.
"Traditional Chinese medicines go back a long way, but when you carefully study the ingredients and effects, or compare their pharmacological effects with those of Western medicines, you discover that Chinese medicines aren't as 'mysterious' as people tend to think," says Teng, who explains that traditional Chinese medicine stresses the importance of differentiating symptoms before applying treatment. When a drug's pharmacological effect is less than ideal, it is generally thought that the researcher may not have found the right clinical patients, or that the pharmacological effect is slow. But when such matters are looked at from the perspective of pharmacoeconomics, if we find that the development of a particular medicine will prove only 40% effective while a currently existing Western medicine is 80% effective, then why not just use the existing medicine? In addition, the pharmacological effect of a given Chinese crude medicine varies depending on where it came from and in what season, which further complicates research; even if a new medicine is eventually developed, it will be difficult to get National Health Insurance to pay for it. Most Chinese herbal medicines at this point are used in health foods. The obstacles to development of new medicines are formidable.
In 1997, the Executive Yuan included "adoption of scientific methods with Chinese herbal medicines" and "development of new medicines" in a list of 24 economic undertakings specially targeted for development. The National Science Council also launched the National Science and Technology Program for Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals (NSTPBP), which Teng chaired during Phase 2 (2003-2006) and Phase 3 (2007-2010). In this role he was responsible for coordinating activities taking place upstream (academic research), midstream (pharmaceutical R&D by entities under the Ministry of Economic Affairs), and downstream (clinical testing at different medical centers). The average annual budget was NT$1.5 billion in Phase 2, and NT$700-800 million in Phase 3.
Chance for a breakthrough
By Phase 3, the focus of research had turned primarily toward the development of new medicines, especially medicines for cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and disorders of the nervous system. "Our goals," says Teng, "were to clarify the mechanism of action of medicines, determine their R&D potential, and enable them to gain patent protection." He points out that the NSTPBP has received 105 clinical study applications over the past eight years, of which 51 have been approved and 20 have already been completed.
A "bridge project" was added to the NSTPBP for Phase 3 to get patent professionals from industry to evaluate whether academic research findings can be developed into new medicines, but the process is lengthy, and necessarily involves the following: chemical modification -> re-evaluation -> modification -> re-evaluation. In other words, when a natural or synthetic compound or protein is acted upon by another compound, careful observation is required to determine whether it will become more active, or less toxic, whether the solubility of an oral solution can be increased, whether safety can be improved, etc. Just because a particular crude medicine has a pharmacological effect does not mean that a new medicine has been discovered.
I have a dream
The National Health Research Institutes, operating with support from the NSTPBP, completed preclinical trials on anti-cancer drug candidates DBPR104 and DBPR204 and in July 2010 signed a technology transfer agreement with Sinphar Group to conduct further clinical testing and research. Phase 1 clinical testing of the two candidate drugs has now been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This signifies that Taiwan now, for the first time, has a completely domestic model for the development and manufacture of a new drug, which is deeply gratifying for Teng.
It is estimated that it takes five to eight years and at least NT$20 billion to get a drug candidate to Phase 3 clinical testing. But while the cost is high, once a drug is successfully launched the payoff is big. Teng explains: "As long as toxicity is predictable, with most drug candidates you can tell by Phase 2 clinical testing how effective it is going to be, and if there is an urgent need for a particular drug, as in the case of AIDS or cancer drugs, and if the FDA feels that Phase 2 results are good, then Phase 3 will go more quickly. The process may actually take longer with drugs for chronic diseases such as high blood pressure, because there are already a lot of good drugs on the market."
For four decades now, Teng has found his calling in teaching, research, and community service. His dream these days is for Taiwan to launch a new medicine in the near future, and it appears this dream may be coming true before too long. But he cares little whether he is the one to get the credit, because success with a single biopharmaceutical redounds to the good of all mankind.