Failure to report equals theft
Before he died, Huang revealed to the media that he had found four other wrecks between 1987 and 1995, and that the structures and even cannons of a few of them were clearly visible. Li Ming-ju, who began studying diving with Huang in 1990, says that Huang originally dived purely for lobster, but that his love of antiques later led him to dive largely for antiquities. He went down as deep as 60 meters, far below the 30-meter floor typical for fishing and recreational dives, and even below the 50-meter limit on salvage from the General No. 1.
Li says that Huang not only loved these ancient objects, but enjoyed sharing them. He turned the front porch of his home into an exhibition hall for the blue-and-white porcelain and other ceramics he found, and even borrowed space from the Penghu County Police Bureau in 1993 for an exhibition of items he had recovered.
Huang's large, very public displays aroused the MOE's ire. It charged him in 1995 in the Penghu District Court with violating an article of the old Cultural Heritage Preservation Act that stated that antiquities from abandoned shipwrecks are the property of the state. The MOE accused Huang of pilfering antiquities belonging to the state and forced him to turn over 783 items-mostly earthenware pots and pieces of porcelain-to the Penghu Cultural Affairs Bureau.
Lacking domestic precedents for handling sunken vessels, the MOE decided to establish an incentive mechanism to reward the discoverers of abandoned antiquities. "This was new territory for Taiwan and the law wasn't comprehensive, so there was a great deal of confusion," recalls Chi Li-mei, who was in charge of creating the mechanism and is now the deputy director of the Penghu Cultural Affairs Bureau.
Huang's friends complain of the unfairness of the MOE's "carrot and stick" approach. Chi says their objections run something like: "Had he known he was going to face legal action, he could have just hidden the stuff and kept quiet about it. He acted in good faith, and you filed charges against him!"
"In those days, the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act didn't receive nearly as much attention as it does today," says Chi. "Few people knew what the law required them to do with 'abandoned antiquities.' Such objects typically used to become decorations in people's living rooms. Honestly, they probably still don't understand the value and significance of antiquities recovered from the sea."
The ridiculous thing about the MOE's accusation that Huang had pillaged Ming and Qing antiquities is that after the museum had found the wreck in September 1998 and dubbed it the General No. 1, archaeologists had little good to say about the items Huang had recovered. They called them "fragments," "common utensils," "discoveries of no particular interest," and "of no historical significance." When they were submitted to the MOE's rewards program, they were estimated to be worth just NT$10,000. Huang accepted a certificate of thanks from the Penghu County Government, which praised his donation of "historical evidence of the trade between Taiwan and Fujian," but he refused the cash award, feeling that it was insulting to both the artifacts and him personally.
These four "olive pits" are perhaps the strangest artifacts retrieved from the General No. 1. They come from a kind of white Chinese olive grown in the southern part of mainland China that is frequently candied. Did they sink with the General, or were they perhaps spit overboard by a modern tourist sucking on them to prevent seasickness?