Digital misunderstandings
The trend toward digital education looks unstoppable. But even as the cloud classroom is taking shape, some parents have expressed worries: Could the incidence of nearsightedness increase if children spend all day staring at a computer screen? Will kids become so absorbed in the Internet that the current “digital divide” in the parent-child relationship becomes even wider? And it’s not only parents who worry. A lot of teachers working in the pedagogical front lines also have misunderstandings about this digital “education revolution.”
Misunderstanding 1: Digital education will undermine teachers’ status
Mobile devices make information gathering fast and easy, posing a serious challenge to the traditional teacher lecturing from the podium. Hyper Convergence Foundation CEO Patrick Lee, who closely follows issues related to digital education, says that these days teachers have to be careful what they say, otherwise students with iPhones and iPads in hand can go online and immediately find out if what the teacher is saying is accurate or not.
Although on-campus digital learning is not intended to radically undermine teachers, it has to be said that, faced with students whose digital abilities and computer operating skills are perhaps already ahead of their own, some teachers inevitably will feel a crisis of confidence in their own minds about their role and status.
With the promotion of mobile learning, teachers also sacrifice some control over the choice of teaching materials, and the format changes from a teacher-centered one to a student-centered one. For teachers, this is a tectonic shift.
“The current generation of children are ‘digital natives’ while teachers are just ‘digital immigrants’ recently arrived in this new world,” says Dahu’s curriculum director Li Hualong. “If you don’t learn how to use IT, you won’t earn the students’ respect,” says Zuoying Elementary teacher Zhang Yufen. It’s not uncommon for the student to be showing the teacher how some of the functions in the e-bookbag work, but this shouldn’t cause any serious damage to the role or functions of the teacher. “After all, teachers have been through a lot more training and have a lot more experience than any student!”
And the new technologies may even make a teacher’s job easier. “In the past when teaching vocabulary, I would have to turn my back on them to write on the board, but with the e-whiteboard and e-bookbags, I can face the students all day long. This is a lot easier for me, and the students won’t dare yawn!” laughs Lin Yuxuan, a teacher at Zuoying Elementary.
“Rather than think of the technology as a substitute for teachers, I prefer to think about ways teachers can integrate with and utilize the technology,” says Dahu Elementary principal Chen Su-lan.
Misunderstanding 2: Digital education is nothing but technology for its own sake
When the e-bookbag first came out, the education community hoped it could help students with a prosaic but all-too-common problem in Taiwan: extraordinarily heavy loads of books carried in the standard school bookbag. But in the early stage, when e-bookbags were not common enough to substantially replace paper textbooks, putting a netbook computer in the bag merely added to the student’s burden. It is only now, with the advent of the tablet computer, and with a growing amount of digital content, that the e-bookbag is again getting attention.
Nonetheless, the functions of the e-bookbag are not limited to simply digitizing textbooks and getting rid of the paper ones. The real key to their importance is in changing the way teachers teach and the way students learn. Patrick Lee reminds us that just because every student has a computer in hand does not mean you have digital education. The keys to the success of digital pedagogy lie in the answers to the questions, “What is being taught?” and “How is it being taught?”
Misunderstanding 3: Digital education will lead to near-sightedness and Internet addiction
The risk that digital education will make nearsightedness in children more likely worries parents perhaps more than anything else. However, testing done over the last few years indicates that student vision has not deteriorated. Moreover, ophthalmologists say that there is only one real cause of nearsightedness in students, and that is that they place their faces too close to what they are reading. As long as the reader maintains an appropriate distance, digital books are no different from paper books.
It is also not likely that there is any relationship between digital education and Internet addiction. T.K. Tien of Intel Taiwan points out that children born in the 1990s have all learned how to use computers outside the classroom, and indeed the gear they have at home is often more advanced than that at school. If a child is addicted to going online, he or she most likely got hooked at home; this problem is not caused by using computers to do classroom assignments.
The Pui Ching Middle School in Macao separately surveyed kindergarten, primary school, and middle school students, and found that 80–90% of the children in each survey said that they knew about, had used, or even owned electronic products. However, most had only used them for playing games. “Children don’t know how to apply the equipment to learn, which is really a shame, and we aim to promote e-learning precisely to address this shortcoming,” says Pui Ching teacher Huang Zhizhong.
Say goodbye to pasting up character flash cards and breathing in chalk dust! When Chen You’an, a teacher at Taipei Municipal Dahu Elementary School, is in class, he can write, enlarge, move, and erase with ease on the electronic whiteboard.