Respecting nature
"For several years after I began painting birds, I ran into many difficulties collecting data because I didn't have the necessary experience," says Yang. "For example, I'd never seen a Formosan hill partridge in the wild. And while I'd caught a couple of quick glimpses of black eagles on riverbanks in the Fu-shan Botanical Garden, I'd never gotten a photograph close up." To fill in the gaps, when he first started working on birds, he borrowed photos from local photographers, raised caged birds, went birding, and took his own photos.
Yang stresses that, in terms of technique, ecological painting isn't very different from doing still lifes. In fact, the biggest difference is one of attitude. "In the past, painting was purely art. It didn't matter whether I painted one leaf more or one less. But eco-painting is different. Respect for nature has to take precedence."
For example, present-day bird species usually have nine to 11 primaries (the largest feathers on the edge of a bird's wing). You have to count them to get the actual number. You don't want even one too many or too few when you are painting them, and each has its own structure, color, and feeling of weight. For example, on most birds the inner sides of the remiges (wing feathers) are wide, and the outer narrow. Moreover, there are many kinds of feathers. In addition to the four varieties of remiges, there are also large and small coverts, rectrices, and ornamentals, not to mention seasonal and environmental variations.
"It's very scientific, based purely on observation," says Yang. "You can't plug in a formula and you can't just make it up." Yang says that the best approach is to study biology and anatomy, and learn to prepare specimens. While many artists are unwilling to take such an approach, it suits Yang's penchant for really digging into research.
At the same time, Yang admits that eco-painting has huge limitations. "But I like it. I like the classics, tradition, and precision, and I despise pointless 'free painting.'"
But Yang protests loudly when people discuss eco-painting in conjunction with photography, something he regards as an insult.
"Painting is fundamentally different from photography," he explains. The human eye and the camera lens see different things. For example, the eye automatically moderates high-contrast colors, but the camera does not. "Photographing a black person and a white one next to one another makes a horrible mess. If you try to get the black color right, the white looks deathly pale."
There's a similar problem with respect to depth of field. "A photo always has a single focal point," explains Yang. "If you focus on a bird's beak, the feathers are going to be out of focus. Focus on the claw in the foreground, and the one in the background will be out of focus. If you paint from photographs without observing living birds, you're lost."
(left) Eco-artist Anderson Yang paints birds brilliantly. These black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) on Mt. Dabao in China's Yunnan Province, based on photographs, are faithfully depicted. The painting softens the high contrast of photos, while varying the intensity of the color to enhance the atmospheric effect.